UNESCO-IESALC

Top Menu

  • UNESCO.ORG
  • Español
  • English

Main Menu

  • THE INSTITUTE
    • About IESALC
    • Mission
    • Governing Board
    • Directory
  • Priorities
    • Internationalization and Academic Mobility
      • Recognition of Academic Degrees
      • New Regional Convention
      • Practical information for recognition by country
    • Quality and relevance
    • Equity and Inclusion
    • Innovation
    • From #CRES2018 to #WHEC2022
      • Regional Consultation for the #WHEC2022
  • Programs
    • Research
      • Futures of Higher Education
      • Academic Mobility
      • Response to COVID-19
      • The Right to Higher Education
      • SDGs
    • Capacity building
      • Campus IESALC
      • EDS Bootcamp 2022
    • Technical cooperation
      • Educational continuity in Peru (PMESUT)
    • Concerted advocacy
  • Publications
    • IESALC Publications
    • ESS Open Journal System
    • CRES 2018 Collection
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Contact us
  • UNESCO.ORG
  • Español
  • English

logo

Higher education for all

UNESCO-IESALC

  • THE INSTITUTE
    • About IESALC
    • Mission
    • Governing Board
    • Directory
  • Priorities
    • Internationalization and Academic Mobility
      • Recognition of Academic Degrees
      • New Regional Convention
      • Practical information for recognition by country
    • Quality and relevance
    • Equity and Inclusion
    • Innovation
    • From #CRES2018 to #WHEC2022
      • Regional Consultation for the #WHEC2022
  • Programs
    • Research
      • Futures of Higher Education
      • Academic Mobility
        • Virtual Student Mobility
      • Response to COVID-19
        • Reopening maps
      • The Right to Higher Education
      • SDGs
    • Capacity building
      • Campus IESALC
      • EDS Bootcamp 2022
    • Technical cooperation
      • Educational continuity in Peru (PMESUT)
    • Concerted advocacy
  • Publications
    • IESALC Publications
    • ESS Open Journal System
    • CRES 2018 Collection
  • Events
  • Blog
    • Public goods, common goods and global common goods: a brief explanation

      10 April, 2022
      0
    • Heightened focus on education after Kazakhstan’s deadly protests | Times Higher Education

      29 January, 2022
      0
    • Transforming the futures of higher education with and for youths

      23 January, 2022
      0
    • UNESCO IESALC hosts students from IE university to undertake a capstone project

      21 January, 2022
      0
    • Higher education on hold at home, students stranded abroad | University World ...

      14 January, 2022
      0
    • Past, present and future of higher education in the world

      16 December, 2021
      0
    • Webinar release – Launch of the report Pathways to 2050 and Beyond. Results of ...

      26 November, 2021
      0
    • Virtual student mobility for a post-pandemic world

      3 November, 2021
      0
    • Higher education in Latin America and the Caribbean, present and future

      19 October, 2021
      0
  • Contact us
Report
Home›Report›IESALC launches study on quality and accreditation in higher education

IESALC launches study on quality and accreditation in higher education

By Sara Maneiro
9 June, 2020
931
0
Share:

On June 3, 2020, during the second session of the 2020 II Forum on Quality Assurance of Higher Education, the UNESCO International Institute of Higher Education for Latin America and the Caribbean, IESALC, presented the report Quality Assurance and Accreditation Criteria in Higher Education. International Perspectives, a study designed to accompany the process of national agendas regarding the quality of higher education carried out with the support of the Colombian Ministry of Education. “The quality assurance process is one of institutional transformation accompanied by innovation and focused on responding to the expectations of students, in connection with the context and with what the regions and the country require. (…) We thank IESALC for this comparative study. I think it gives us a framework to understand and contextualize the process that we have been carrying out over the past two years regarding the qualified register of high-quality assurance”, said the Colombian Minister of Education, María Victoria Angulo, in the words of welcome to the forum.

Focusing on accreditation processes of both institutions and higher education programs, the study examines the work of the ten quality assurance agencies in their political contexts, and identifies critical issues in accreditation processes, ranging from how to incorporate students’ academic achievements as a fundamental vector, to how to promote quality in the respect of diversity, not forgetting who should evaluate the agencies’ work and how to do so, as is indicated in the presentation.

Designed by Francesc Pedró, director of the IESALC, and developed with the contribution of Aliandra Barlete, researcher at the University of Cambridge, the paper addresses different meanings of quality assurance (QA), including “process of building confidence that the provision of education meets expectations or at least meets minimum standards”, in addition to establishing local benchmarks for the improvement of the HE system as a whole. “QA can also be a tool for self-regulation by increasing competition between institutions and programs, for example by establishing national rankings,” the authors say.

 

Promoters and quality assurance strategies

The authors say that since the late 1980s, QA has been a key concern for States and has become a common strategy for HE policies. Some factors that have fostered it are: the massification of HE and the consequent increase in public spending, the New Public Management agenda, and internationalization (globalization), which has increased the need for internationally comparable and recognized titles, and a transparent evaluation system, which is an essential condition for comparability.

Quality assurance is expected to be part of the mandate of national governments. Citizens can legitimately expect the State to protect their rights, reflect the legitimate concerns of the public and bring them to the attention of providers, if necessary through external regulation. But institutional self-regulation also seems to emerge as a form of governance.

Another reason for this concern is the increase in the number of students, indicative of the need for institutions and programs to meet the demand, which may result in a proliferation of HEI that should be properly regulated in their diversity.

 

Impact of quality management in HE

Evidence in some countries shows that external QA has helped to establish new formal standards, for example the modularization of education in Germany, although the extent to which this has created a qualitative change may be debatable.

Sweden abandoned the measurements of the evaluation processes and focuses on the quality of the final thesis of the students, and has tried to create national degree exams, which point towards the direct measurement of the knowledge and skills of the students at the end of their studies.

In the United States, for example, the CLA and CLA + tests have been widely deployed to examine generic competencies, while in Mexico, the General Examinations for Graduate Studies (EGEL) are used by many institutions to evaluate graduates in specific disciplinary areas. In Colombia, all HE students are required to take a general proficiency test (Saber Pro) in order to graduate. The ENADE exam in Brazil is the only example of large-scale external exams that are compulsory for students and at the same time are used directly in the QA of programs and institutions.

In Argentina, the effect of CONEAU has been considered positive. In a group of institutions that went through the accreditation process with a case study in Engineering, the analysis indicated that, beyond establishing a quality standard, the policy generated continuous improvements to the accredited degrees. As a result, institutions were urged to review curricula, update teaching and learning methodologies, and to invest in new equipment and in the training of the staff.

Some lessons and recommendations emerge from the comparative analysis of this study: The first one is that in order to develop a quality culture for student teaching and learning, as well as to create conditions to guarantee and improve academic standards within HEI, the active participation of the leaders of an institution and academic staff are necessary.

The second lesson is that, to guarantee quality and accreditation, the processes to be evaluated must include: the design and approval of new course modules and study programs; procedures for reviewing academic programs; practices governing qualification and identification standards; procedures that influence the evaluation of teaching; procedures that affect student assessments; and other relevant components of the institution’s general processes to guarantee and improve academic standards.

The third lesson is that, in the opinion of academic staff, the most effective and legitimate instruments have methodologies with expert peer reviewers trained and supported during the review process by professional staff, and employ systematic and standardized procedures and protocols.

“One of the great challenges of unsolved quality assurance processes is cultural diversity. It is necessary to establish quality assurance mechanisms that look at how higher education institutions (HEI) are adjusting little by little. Today we realize that the most useful thing is to help each of the HEI to improve their quality. We cannot continue to rely on institutional standards. We have to go one step further, contextualizing the work of each institution and recognizing it in its diversity,” said Pedró during the closing of the forum.

Download the publication on quality assurance and accreditation criteria here

 

Photo Edwin Andrade – Creative Commons No known copyright restrictions.


  Subscribe to our newsletter   
Anterior

IESALC launched the FIESA 2021 webinar series

Siguiente

IESALC Study on Quality and Accreditation opened ...

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

Artículos relacionados

  • Equity and InclusionReportWebinar

    Has the female advantage put an end to gender inequalities? A report and a debate seek to provide an answer

    10 March, 2021
    By Yara Bastidas
  • ReportWebinar

    Launching of the report and open dialogue on Women in higher education: has the female advantage put an end to ...

    1 March, 2021
    By Yara Bastidas

  • Equity and Inclusion

    Indigenous peoples and Afro-Descendants face multiple racism in higher education | jornada.com

  • News

    Higher Education and Society (ESS) reaches its thematic issue 30

  • International

    How green are universities? / The World University Rankings

 

  • 20 May, 2022

    WHEC2022 set a roadmap for higher education for the next decade

  • 20 May, 2022

    Joint research aims to transform the current higher education digital landscape in the LAC region

  • 19 May, 2022

    UNESCO IESALC and Times Higher Education launch report on universities’ contribution to gender equality and women’s empowerment Part 2

  • 19 May, 2022

    The right to higher education approached through a social justice lens

  • 19 May, 2022

    Cultural stereotypes and lack of support prevent Eastern African women from advancing in higher education

COVID-19 AND HIGHER EDUCATION

  • Report reveals the state of higher education two years on from the disruption of Covid-19

    By Claudia Delgado Barrios
    18 May, 2022
  • New report unveils financial aid measures taken in the region for higher education students during the pandemic

    By Yamel Rincon
    16 July, 2021
  • Closing now to reopen better tomorrow? Pedagogical continuity in Latin American Universities during the pandemic

    By Yamel Rincon
    12 July, 2021
  • COVID-19: Monitoring the state of higher education in Latin America and the Caribbean

    By Sara Maneiro
    12 July, 2021

UNESCO IESALC applies a zero tolerance policy against all forms of harassment

OUR NEWSLETTER

  Subscribe to our newsletter   

FOLLOW US

  •   Facebook
  •   Twitter
  •   Linkedin
  •   Instagram
  •   Youtube
  • © UNESCO IESALC 2021
  • Disclaimer of use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Opportunities
  • Contact us